Print Over Pixels: Faux Digital with Kodak Ektar 100 35mm

3

Do not belittle the Kodak Ektar 100 35mm low ISO, its light-sensitive capabilities is enough to capture even among the darkest of conditions, without losing the sharpness and color. Depending on the photographer’s taste, the Kodak Ektar remains faithful to the naked eye, unless you want some textures, light leaks and vignettes thrown in, of course.

These photographs from community members will definitely make you think twice about your digital camera (or in some cases, even your smartphone).

Seamless vintage

Credits: jeffr, lomoteddy, poepel, lunt82, alex34 & warrilow-tong

Low light sharpness

Credits: grazie, sandravo, strangelilgirl, jerryka, roberthenry & bravopires

Perfect for fine doubles

Credits: anafaro, poepel, gorics, sallycanela & saintempire

Moments of clarity

Credits: vici, stratski, poepel, lunasimoncini & thecheekyscamp

Between analogue lo-fi and digital quality

Credits: pearlgirl77, aka_papu, kleeblatt, xbalboax, mephisto19 & olgusz

2016-07-31 #gear #35mm #analogue-photography #kodak-ektar-100 #film-photography #art-photography #creative-photography

3 Comments

  1. sirio174
    sirio174 ·

    @lomographymagazine You're wrong. Film has not to emulate or compete with digital cameras, because, especially for low and medium ISO speed, film is insuperable as tones, plasticity, backlight rendition. Consider that many digital photographer use software to emulate film in postprocessing of their digital images. But none of us, and nanalogue photographer is interested to use postprocessing software to emulate the digital! LOMO ON! Film is the best!

  2. sirio174
    sirio174 ·

    ... and no analogue photographer (sorry for the errata)

  3. cb1
    cb1 ·

    @sirio174 I agree 100% give me FILM!!!!!!

More Interesting Articles